Free expression in the news

GLOBAL
The PS4′s Share Button Needs To Be All Or Nothing, Publisher Censorship Won’t Work
The PlayStation 4 is doing many things right. It’s ticking the boxes the developers want to see – it’s certainly powerful enough and that RAM is well received; it’s making gamers happy with great first party titles and solid third party support; and it’s making publishers happy – it’ll even offer publishers the ability to block which sections of the game players can share.
(The Sixth Axis)

EGYPT
How free are Egypt’s new voices?
Two years after the 2011 revolution in Egypt, a growing number of satellite TV channels are expressing a range of views – from liberal to ultra conservative. (BBC)

INDIA
Debate on free speech limits at Mario Miranda Cartoon Festival
After joining The Current in 1952, Mario Miranda drew his first political cartoon poking fun at Bombay’s home minister at the time, Morarji Desai. The cartoon delighted Miranda’s editor, DF Karaka, but annoyed Desai and elicited angry responses from the public. “That experience taught Mario the lesson that in India for an ambitious cartoonist to lampoon some political personage was to invite trouble,” wrote author Manohar Malgonkar in the book “Mario de Miranda”.
(The Times of India)

Resisting the impunity
The agency of journalists to push the envelope and the wider public’s demand for credible, trustworthy news sources are the positive development. On the flip side, there is a real fear of casting away the hard-won freedoms, and, as its extension, a vibrant, common forum for dialogue and debate is under severe strain. The challenges come from multiple sources.
(The Hindu)

Bollywood censorship to be relaxed
India’s all-powerful censor board is planning a lighter approach to Bollywood after decades chopping tens of thousands of film scenes, from onscreen kisses to violent endings.The Himalayan Times)

IRELAND
A crock of gold for libel tourists who bring cases to Emerald Isle
Ah, the good old law of unintended consequences pops up again. Who would have thought that Irish jobs could be affected by the passage at Westminster last week of the Defamation Act?
(Ruth Dudley-Edwards, Irish Independent)

MALAWI
President Joyce Banda waiting for advice on press pact
President Joyce Banda has said she is waiting for expert advice from the Attorney General (AG) and the Minister of Justice on whether to sign the Table Mountain Declaration. The President has come under fire from the press as well as human rights activists over her refusal to sign the accord which proposes abolition of insult laws in Africa.
(The Daily Times)

RUSSIA
A year into Russia crackdown, protesters try again
A year ago, Russia’s political opposition was on the rise and aiming for new heights at a demonstration on the eve of President Vladimir Putin’s inauguration. Instead, authorities cracked down, ending their tolerance toward the thousands of Putin opponents who presented him with the greatest challenge to his rule since he took over the country in 2000.
(Washington Post)

UNITED KINGDOM
Why Britain Refuses To Publish Amanda Knox’s Memoir
We flatter ourselves when we boast of mastery of the ironic style. Unlike literal-minded Germans and Americans, we are not ashamed to live behind masks and speak in riddles. (Nick Cohen, the Observer)

THE FREE SPEECH BLOG

A SAD DAY IN OKLAHOMA….

To our friends and citizens of Moore, Oklahoma: 

Please know we are think of you at this very sorrowful time. Our prayers are with you and your family. May God comfort you in your losses and bless all those that are dear to you!
FREEDOM OF SPEECH

Sometimes censorship is complicated, and sometimes it’s really simple

Schoolteacher censored: Tomás Ó Dulaing (picture: Lucan Gazette)

Dublin’s Evening Herald brings us this story of Tommy Morris, and adviser to Derek Keating, a TD (member of parliament) for the government party, Fine Gael.

Keating has been involved in a dispute with a local school principal, Tomás Ó Dulaing, after the TD apparently claimed credit for a school building extension in Lucan, a neighbourhood in Keating’s Dublin Mid-West constituency.

Local freesheet The Lucan Gazette ran a front-page story last week in which Ó Dulaing accused Keating of “gross cynical opportunism” in taking credit for the work. In an open letter, the principal attacked Keating, saying: “Neither did anybody from our board of management or staff contact you or seek your assistance in relation to the extension. You had absolutely nothing to do with this development, and yet you distribute a leaflet in the Lucan area claiming to have ‘initiated, led and delivered’ this extension.”

How to respond to this? Keating’s aide Morris took Route 1, entering a Centra minimarket in Lucan and grabbing a bundle of Gazettes before throwing them in a rubbish bin nearby.

Mr Keating was, needless to say, shocked (shocked!) by his aide’s hands-on censorship technique, telling the Herald:

“I am shocked and disappointed at Tommy’s actions, which I had no knowledge of. I cannot believe what he did and I certainly did not direct him to do so.

“But Tommy was upset when he saw the article and must have had a rush of blood to the head. We don’t believe the article was fair at all to me.

“Tommy was out in the area taking down posters depicting me as an abortionist when he entered the shop and saw the papers.

“This publication is a free sheet so there is no question of Tommy breaking the law.”

To be fair to Mr Morris, he was already out on a mission pulling down posters critical of his boss: Would a few local papers really make any difference?

(h/t Niamh Puirseil)

Lucan Echo

UPDATE: “Derek Bleating” on Twitter (we suspect not his real name), points out that the Lucan Echo had the same front page story. But as you have to pay for the Echo, Morris seems to have left it unmolested. Strongest case for paying for content yet made?

Padraig Reidy is senior writer for Index on Censorship. @mePadraigReidy

THE FREE SPEECH BLOG

Honouring a pledge for Tahitian independence

Radio Australia video.The United Nations General Assembly has restored French Polynesia to the UN list of territories to be decolonised at a meeting boycotted by France. The resolution, passed by consensus, was sponsored by Solomon Islands, Nauru and Tuvalu last February but not tabled until Friday. It calls on France to intensify its dialogue with French Polynesia to include a fair
Café Pacific – David Robie | Media freedom and transparency

Mulcair stays silent about bribe

Ezra Levant says Mulcair was part of a conspiracy of silence when he failed to speak out about a bribe offered to him by a corrupt official.

This report aired on The Source May 17 2013.

Ezra Levant

Sore losers: Will BC environmental extremists ‘rise up’ again as they did in the 1990s?

ezra dix 2.jpg

B.C.’s NDP started the recent provincial election campaign with a 22-point lead in the polls, and ended 4% behind the Liberals. It was a surprise ending, and not every NDP activist is willing to accept defeat.

On election night, NDP strategist (and Vancouver alderman) Geoff Meggs said that if the Liberal government allowed oilsands pipelines to be built to the west coast, there could be massive acts of civil disobedience.

He invoked the Idle No More campaign of illegal road and railway blockades, and said the “War in the Woods” could return to B.C.

The War in the Woods refers to the crime wave committed by environmental extremists in the 1990s — many pouring in from outside the province — to stop logging on Vancouver Island. Some were protesters engaged in peaceful civil disobedience. But many went further, engaging in criminal acts and even violence.

Logging roads were sabotaged, putting truck drivers at risk of injury or death. A bridge was burned down. Hundreds of people were arrested for trespass and mischief. And eco-terrorists invented a new weapon: Tree-spiking.

If environmentalists couldn’t stop loggers from cutting down trees, perhaps they could do things that might have the effect of harming or even killing loggers. They would sneak into a forest and hammer an iron spike into a tree. That spike wouldn’t be noticed as the tree was harvested.

But when that log was taken to the sawmill, the iron spike would hit the power saw, shredding it, causing metal shrapnel to explode like a hand grenade. Anyone standing nearby in the sawmill would be injured or even killed, and of course the saw itself would be destroyed.

It was a perfect reflection of the morality of the eco-extremists; they put the life of a tree ahead of the lives of human beings.

When sawmills tried to detect these weapons by installing metal detectors, the eco-terrorists moved one step ahead, too.

They switched to concrete spikes, which are invisible to metal detectors. This tactic continues to this day in British Columbia.

And anti-pipeline terrorism has come to the province, with homemade bombs blowing up natural gas installations.

That’s the War in the Woods Meggs was talking about. Add in Idle No More, and you’re talking about a low-level civil war.

Was Meggs just being dramatic, speaking out of election night emotion?

Meggs wasn’t proposing this course of action. He was predicting it. He’s plugged in to the environmental movement. It’s what he thinks could happen.

That same night, other sore losers were happy to go on the record confirming their intentions to use force.

The Dogwood Initiative is one of more than 200 lobby groups that registered to campaign in the election, which allowed them to spend up to 0,000 to promote the NDP.

Dogwood’s key objective was to stop oil pipelines to the coast — especially the proposed Enbridge pipeline to the port of Kitimat. Which is why they backed the NDP, which called for a moratorium on new pipeline construction.

That extremist NDP platform, announced mid-way in the campaign, is widely believed to have been a turning point. It was when ordinary British Columbians started to worry about job losses under the NDP. It’s what put the Liberals back in office.

But instead of accepting the democratic will of the people, here’s what Dogwood’s campaigns director, Eric Swanson, wrote in a press release:

“We are hopeful the next government will stand up for B.C. and say no to Enbridge, in line with the wishes of the B.C. public. If they don’t, citizens will rise up once again to force the government to take action.”

It takes great chutzpah, on the very night of the election, to claim that British Columbians want the opposite of what they just voted for.

But it moves from audacity to menace to warn that if the democratic government does not obey Swanson’s demands, radicals will “rise up once again to force” them?

Force? Rise up? Again — as in, like last time?

We know what environmental extremists are going to do. What will we do in response?

This column was written for Sun News May 19 2013.

Ezra Levant

NLRB “Poster Ruling” May Reveal Court’s Take on Verizon 1st Amendment Net Neutrality Claim

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit – the same Court that will hear Verizon’s suit against the FCC’s Net Neutrality order later this year – came out with a ruling last week which may bolster the claim that the FCC violated Verizon’s First Amendment rights through its Net Neutrality regulations.

In National Association of Manufacturers v. National Labor Relations Board, the Court tossed out a rule by the NLRB which made employers presumptively guilty of unfair labor practices simply by not displaying government posters informing workers of their rights.

Interestingly, a centerpiece of the Court’s reasoning hinges on the fact that the First Amendment protects speakers from government-compelled speech.

How does this apply to the upcoming Net Neutrality case?

Well, in operating its networks, Verizon avers it is a “speaker,” possessing editorial discretion akin to a newspaper.  In its view (one I agree with), the Order – such as its no blocking and non-discrimination requirements – compels the network provider to take all (lawful) speech all the time, even speech it does not desire to have on its network.   Moreover, it forbids the provider from favoring or differentiating its content and offerings over others’, essentially compelling a free, unlimited right of access by third-parties to speak over the company’s “modern day microphone.”

The following quotes were taken from the NLRB ruling.  True – there are a number of other factors that will affect how the Court decides the case.  That said, these excerpts provide some modest insight into how the Court might approach Verizon’s First Amendment claim:

  • P. 17 – “The right to disseminate another’s speech necessarily includes the right to decide not to disseminate it. First Amendment law acknowledges this apparent truth: ‘all speech inherently involves choices of what to say and what to leave unsaid.’”
  • P. 17 – “Chief Justice Roberts, writing for a unanimous Court, put it this way in Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic & Institutional Rights, Inc.: ‘Some of [the] Court’s leading First Amendment precedents have established the principle that freedom of speech prohibits the government from telling people what they must say.’”
  • P. 17 – “As the Supreme Court put it in United States v. United Foods, Inc.: ‘Just as the First Amendment may prevent government from prohibiting speech, the Amendment may prevent the government from compelling individuals to express certain views…’”
  • P. 18 – “The right against compelled speech is not, and cannot be, restricted to ideological messages.”
  • P. 20 – “[E]ven in cases in which the message was other than one the government had devised, a ‘compelled-speech violation’ occurred when ‘the complaining speaker’s own message was affected by the speech it was forced to accommodate.’”

If the Court reaches the constitutional claim (which is not a given, as seen at 4:30 in this video), Verizon will succeed to the extent it can show it is more than merely a mute conduit; that it is in fact a “modern day microphone” – or certainly could be more of one – which has been forbidden from speaking as it sees fit, in its own fashion and at its own direction due to an FCC rule that cannot be constitutionally justified.

Media Freedom

Prime Minister pushes pipeline

Former US ambassador to Canada, David Wilkins, joins Ezra Levant to discuss the pipeline push in America.

This report aired on The Source May 17 2013.

Ezra Levant

‘Opportunistic, reactionary alliance’ – an open letter on Fiji

A one-time outspoken Fiji trade unionist, academic, author and commentator, Scott MacWilliam, who believes in free speech declares in an open letter to the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) president Ged Kearney why he won’t be supporting the “Destination Fiji” campaign.

Dear Ged,

UNFORTUNATELY, on this occasion the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU) has the situation in Fiji
Café Pacific – David Robie | Media freedom and transparency

Eco-partisans suffer loss

Unions and eco-radicals poured big money into the BC election in an attempt to get Adrian Dix and the NDP elected; they were rejected by the voters of British Columbia.

This report aired on The Source May 16 2013.

Ezra Levant